Global Climate Change Action

LATEST: "Perhaps the $240,000 payment could be put to a good public conservation cause by Forestry Tasmania," Senator Brown said.
http://bob-brown.greensmps.org.au/content/media-release/forestry-tasmani...

http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/06/11/2594942.htm "Public donations pay Brown's legal bill"

For those wishing to contribute to the outrageous court costs awarded against Bob Brown following his legal challenge against Forestry Tasmania (destroyer of old growth), the details are:

Name of account: Bob Brown Forest Account
BSB No. 633 000
A/C No. 125 133 793
Name of person donating to be placed in the reference

Or - Cheque made payable to Bob Brown Forest Account GPO Box 404, Hobart, 7001.

There should be no surprise Don Burke has joined Gunns.

The self-described "practical environmentalist" (perhaps in the manner of John Howard's "practical reconciliation") was until earlier this year head of the "Australian Environment Foundation"
an Institute of Public Affairs-linked group of climate change denialists, opponents of landclearing restrictions and nuclear power and timber industry supporters. An Institute of Public Affairs-linked group of climate change denialists, opponents of landclearing restrictions and nuclear power and timber industry supporters.

Burke has described the environmental movement as "obsolete"
and "the greatest threat to the world's environment".

Gunns received an award from the Foundation in 2006 for grasslands
management and protection of an endangered butterfly

Gunns has also provided funding to the IPA.

-- Bernard Keane
- from today's Crikey
------------------------------
Reference links:
AEF: http://www.aefweb.info/index.php?source=cmailer
ABC Story: "AEF Honours Gunns" http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200609/s1752110.htm?source=cmailer
Don Burke Retires as Chair of AEF: http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/2008/09/don-burke-retires-as-chair-of-t...
-----------------------------------
thanks to Peter from the CCA Group

Beware of "missing words" when perusing political party’s policies and deciding where you will be casting your PRECIOUS 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th votes....

If, like me, you wish to see an end to the nuclear industry (firstly) on moral grounds, followed closely by environmental grounds, and clearly not needed on financial grounds, then expanding the mining of Uranium in Australia is NOT wanted, needed or necessary.

Of course if you are a Rio Tinto shareholder, you may think otherwise.

Recently, whilst participating in the Cycle against the nuclear cycle, I visited the Gladstone Office of our local standing MP, Paul Neville (National/Liberal Coalition) and spoke with his Secretary. She couldn't tell me if their party would be considering a nuclear power plant in this electorate or not. Her advice to me and my friend was that this issue needed further investigation. "Informed" decisions would not be forthcoming until after the election.

To me, that says... "when our party is voted back into power we will do whatever we want, it's not your business now. You are not a scientist!"
or... "don't you worry about that".

I am a registered voter. Where I put my mark IS my business. Where my taxes are spent IS my business. I need answers before these two parties are given further opportunities at destroying MY future.

The Labor Party won't commit to nuclear power stations (yet), they will however commit to an expansion of Uranium mining to supply the growing nuclear industry - and they already have.

The Greens, Socialist Alliance and Australian Democrats are clear where they stand. They stand in favour of sustainable development, social justice and equality. Clearly, nuclear does not fit the bill. These parties have made it clear in their policies that they will not support an expansion of the nuclear industry or nuclear energy - (as an "alternative" energy).

The new party "Climate Change Coalition" (CCC) stands in favour of sustainable housing developments, improved transportation systems and better education (as do the three parties listed above).

The CCC are in favour of many good things which will mitigate the worst effects of climate change in the long term but so are the Greens, the Socialist Alliance and the Australian Democrats.

However, the CCC intend to leave ALL OTHER polices to the "conscience vote" of any candidate who is elected. This tends to really worry me. How will their ideas and policies be implemented? Where is their financial plan for our taxes? What say the CCC on our health care taxes? Where do they stand on Industrial Relations and Workplace Agreements?

What also worries me is that they leave the door open for the nuclear industry when they state:

..."Does nuclear power have a role to play in a climate change reduction strategy? James Lovelock, the founder of Gaia Hypothesis, thinks that it can be a useful element in a greenhouse reduction strategy for some countries. Others, such as Australian scientist and climate change campaigner, Emeritus Professor Ian Lowe sees nuclear power as a cure as bad as the disease.
This debate is unavoidable and essential. The CCC encourages our best and brightest minds to state their cases - realising that any debate on Nuclear Power immediately involves alternative power."

In other words... when it comes to the nuclear industry and nuclear power... they sit on the fence. Let others worry about that in an informed and "open" debate? History clearly shows the "openness" of the nuclear industry and the honesty of their "debate".

There is no need for further debate. Expanding the nuclear industry IS avoidable and NOT essential.

The nuclear industry is not safe, and it never was, and it never will be.
In any doubt? please visit:

Startling fact and figures:
http://www.43things.com/entries/view/1888283

Or "Maralinga - Learn from our experience" by my (then) 15yo daughter, Natalie:
http://www.43things.com/entries/view/1881061
and explore the highly educational links in the Appendix

or Nuclear Industry - human effects - facts you should know http://www.43things.com/entries/view/1875511

Finally, today's latest:
Nuclear Power and water scarcity: By Dr Jim Green
http://globalclimatechangeaction.org/node/122
(fliers available shortly)

It appears that the CCC's nuclear policies are hand in hand with those of our currently elected leaders... they "may" support nuclear industry power generation and an expansion of this industry and the associated waste.
Their "vote catching policies" are attached in a PDF document.

Unless the CCC can inform me clearly that they will not support nuclear power or an expansion of the nuclear industry in Australia, I will be putting my vote for the CCC below the ALP, to be sure that their preference flow does not re-elect a National/Liberal Coalition.

I hope other voters are aware of the insidious nature of the nuclear industry and all of their "dirty tricks" to retain their control over our precious taxes.

Anne Goddard