by Dr. Alison Broinowski
(Published with permision from the Author for not-for-profit public awareness purposes)
"In late June and early July, just as the Howard Government was dispatching the army to Aboriginal communities to deal with sexual abuse, the U.S. military was involved for two weeks in northern Australia in the biggest ever joint exercise, Talisman Sabre.
Most Australians saw no connection.
Military training areas, uranium mines, sites for future nuclear waste dumps and now Aboriginal land seized by the Commonwealth are dots across the Australian map.
Several of them are connected by the Adelaide-Darwin railway. Having been many times promised, the $1.3 billion link from Alice Springs to Darwin was surprisingly found viable in 1999. By January, 2004, the train was running. The only tenderer, according to research at University of Technology Sydney, was the FreightLink consortium led by Halliburton (then headed by US vice-president Dick Cheney), with state, territory and federal contributions.
FreightLink owns the railway and can operate it for 50 years. It has contracted UK firm Serco, to staff and service the train.
Serco, which manages British nuclear power plants, gained a reputation in 2000 for sacking workers without AWAs at Australian naval bases in Jervis Bay.
In November, 2006, FreightLink was reported to be facing its third annual loss in a row. It tried to sell a majority stake in the railway for $360 million, without success. The owners promised to invest an additional $14 million over three years, presumably betting on the line's long-term profitability.
It must expect - or have been promised - the railway will serve the potentially lucrative nuclear and defence industries.
Between 2004 and 2006, the Australian and U.S. governments announced more collaboration between American forces and the ADF, including missile defence (Star Wars) training, and interoperability. Several defence facilities in northern Australia have been built or expanded:
at Bradshaw and Delamere in the Northern Territory, Shoalwater Bay in Queensland and Yampi Sound and Geraldton in Western Australia.
The railway passes near several bases, the biggest uranium deposits in the world and the mines at Olympic Dam (Roxby Downs), Beverley, Ranger and Honeymoon.
Freightlink's main business now is transporting iron ore, manganese and uranium to Darwin for export. In June, 2006, just before Prime Minster John Howard set up a nuclear power inquiry, businessmen Hugh Morgan, Robert Champion de Crespigny and Ron Walker registered Australian Nuclear Energy. It later emerged they had discussed with Mr Howard a plan to build a nuclear plant near Port Augusta.
----
(Learn more about Hugh:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hugh_Morgan_%28Australian_businessman%29
> snip from Wikipedia
>In June 2006, Hugh Morgan formed the company Australian Nuclear Energy with Fairfax chairman Ron Walker and fellow mining executive Robert Champion de Crespigny, planning to build nuclear power plants in Australia. Morgan has a 20% stake in the company.
Controversially, Prime Minister John Howard revealed that he had a discussion with Mr Walker about the company days before he announced an inquiry into nuclear power (the inquiry predicted that Australia could have 25 nuclear reactors producing a third of the country's electricity by 2050)
Formerly an outspoken opponent of Aboriginal Land Rights (Morgan claimed Native Title threatened Australia's sovereignty), Morgan has more recently spoken of reconciling mining with Aboriginal welfare. With newly introduced, less transparent conservation agreements under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act , Morgan has flagged how an internationally owned nuclear waste repository could now be built (such as the one recently announced on Aboriginal land).
see more about Ron and Robert
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ron_Walker
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Champion_de_Crespigny
------
The railway would take uranium ore to Darwin for export, enrichment and fabrication, and bring it back to Port Augusta as nuclear fuel for the reactor. The spent fuel
would then go back by rail to Darwin for export, or return to the NT for disposal at a waste site.
The only "suitable" sites for disposal of nuclear waste under federal government control are in the NT. If the Commonwealth takes control of as many as 80 Aboriginal communities through five-year leases in the name of
protecting children, it will put vast land areas at the Federal Government's discretion.
The Government has begun to repeal parts of its 1999 legislation prohibiting nuclear activities.
But it is unlikely before the 2007 election to say where or how Australian nuclear waste will be stored.
The U.S., meanwhile, has more than 47,000 tonnes of high-level nuclear waste to get rid of, because its new site at Yucca Mountain, Nevada, does not meet safety requirements.
The controlling American interest in the railway indicates Australia will store American waste too.
It takes more than the Ghan railway to connect the dots in an election year. A lot more is happening than Australians are being told.
---------
Dr Alison Broinowski is a former Australian diplomat
and is now a visiting fellow at the Australian National
University's Faculty of Asian Studies. Her latest book
is Allied and Addicted.
Comments
Senate Preference Deals Go Nuclear. NSW, WA & Victoria
Senate Preference arrangements in New South Wales, Western Australia & Victoria where a new Party the Conservatives For Climate & Environment that conceals its advocacy for the Nuclear industry behind rhetoric about Carbon Tax, are running a total of six Senate candidates (2 per state)
In NSW An elaborate preference deal appears to have been brokered that engages some strange bedfellows being in order of group:
Group C: Family First, Group D: Pauline's UAP, Group J: (Un-endorsed) Ian R Bryce, Group K: Hear Our Voice, Group L: Senator On Line, Of course N: Conservatives For Climate & Environment, Group Q: The Fishing Party, Group R: The Christian Democrats (Fred Nile Group), Group S: One Nation, Group T: The Non Custodial Parents Party.
There was a Daily Telegraph article that stated that the Australian Democrats (Group M) refused to be part of this axis & that the Climate Change Coalition (Group E) have made only a half hearted attempt to distance itself from this deal by relegating the Conservatives For Climate & Environment to the rear of its preferences.
In Victoria
In many instances the fix is less obvious due to many of the groups giving the occasional preference to red herrings (Parties with no involvement)
There seems to be only Nine Parties involved being:
Group B: One Nation, Group E: Senator On Line, Group K: Family First, Group L : Liberty & Democracy Party, Group M: Conservatives for Climate & Environment, Group N: DLP, Group P: (Un-endorsed) John Perkins, Group R: Non Custodial Parents Party & Group W: Carers
In WA
Again in some cases some of these parties have preferenced the occasional red herring but again strange allegiances emerge.
The Parties involved seem to be:
Group B: Christian Democratic Party, Group D: The Non Custodial Parents Party, Group G : The Australian Democrats, Group H: One Nation WA, Group I: Family First, Group J: Senator On Line, Group K: Carers Alliance, Group M: (Unendorsed) Wynne/ Fitzgerald , Group N: Climate Change Coalition , Group S: Conservatives For Climate & Environment, & Group T: The Liberty & Democracy Party
Conclusion
Parties have draw up their own Group Voting Preferences & are often unaware of allegiances between other parties when they choose their order of preference. You the voter can examine all the parties standing & with more data now available can individually choose better preferences than the Parties Group Voting Ticket by voting below the line in your order of preference.
Fully Preferential Voting gives voters a unique opportunity to register our disapproval by putting a candidate last or near to last
You Can view the Parties Senate Preference Details on the AEC website:
http://www.aec.gov.au/Elections/federal_elections/2007/candidates/gvt.ht...
And open the pdf for group voting tickets in each State
You can also search for different candidates websites to view their policies
With hope for peace in our future
Democracy's Defender
And the Common Benefactor is
Note that the common benefactor from this deal is the Conservatives for Climate & Environment, who will receive all of the preferences from these Groups, provided that this group receives enough primary votes to prevent being eliminated. Note also who the Liberal's preferred dozen parties are - no surprises.
Author approval
Dr Broinowski's has given me permission to publish her article in full. It includes reference material.
The full article is available as an attachment to the original post (Join the nuclear industry dots).
Post new comment