Clearly, the issue of Climate Change is alive and well in the minds of many who will be casting their votes on 24/11/07.
Nobel Peace Prize winner, Al Gore's, "An Inconvenient Truth" helped to facilitate a steep rise in public awareness.
Climate change skeptics argue that changes are natural phenomena caused by various things, nothing to worry about. Nothing to cause voters to seriously consider changing the way they have always voted.
Perhaps our own CSIRO along with the majority of the scientific community are in fact, "left wing" idiots, and we have absolutely nothing to worry about. No theory can be 100% correct until it is proved beyond any doubt,
right? Yep, right.
Well, proving the scientific community right in this particular instance is not such a smart long term goal for our species.
Proving Climate Change is a just a bunch of hot wind from a kooky crew of left wing loonies has NOT happened. That is also not 100% correct!
What has happened is that climate change skeptics have provided us with "other reasons" for the phenomena.
Whatever the cause for the phenomena, and whether climate change is "real" or not, we have now been clearly warned.
The two majour parties are getting nervous and addressing the issue in their own way. Of course they have ensured that their policies promote "business as usual". No need to upset the cookie cart.
Playing it safe, I will be choosing to cast my vote with a political party that has clearly and formally addressed the issue of Climate Change within their policies and who will provide local "clean" energy solutions which are
economically viable and safe for myself and my family.
Choosing a political party which has devised a solid financial plan to do this (with our taxes) is a very "safe" concept.
I'm very glad (and grateful) that I have an option of not having to vote for the two majour parties.
This election I'm going to go with the scientific community because I am a climate change believer, have been for a long time. I remain hopeful that mankind can evolve beyond this global crisis.
To me, this election represents our last chance to get it sorted, in the right way, for all.
Anne Goddard
Comments
some more info for sceptics:
with thanks to Paul Banik via LGP Forums:
"No such thing as Global Warming"
http://www.new.facebook.com/home.php?ref=logo#/topic.php?uid=7629233915&...
I don't pay attention to mediots. I pay attention to people who have evidence to back up what they say, not emotion. Fact trumps fiction every single time. Scientists who have actually studied the situation are more credible sources of information than people who haven't. I will take an expert's opinion on a subject as being more credible over someone who has no or little knowled about that particular subject. Here's some URLs about the topic.
Evidence of Global Warming http://www.ecobridge.org/content/g_evd.htm
New global warming evidence presented
Scientists say their observations prove industry is to blame
David Perlman, Chronicle Science Editor
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2005/02/19/MNGE1BECP...
THE PHOTOGRAPHIC DOCUMENTATION OF CLIMATE CHANGE
http://www.worldviewofglobalwarming.org/
Study reveals growing evidence of global warming
http://www.canada.com/topics/news/story.html?id=326fe156-c93e-4623-a268-...
Evidence for Global Warming
by Larry Vardiman, Ph.D.
http://www.icr.org/article/3233/
Scientific Evidence Increasing Temperatures & Greenhouse Gases
http://www.whrc.org/resources/online_publications/warming_earth/scientif...
want more information...?
From Greg via the yahoo climate change action group:-
Climate change: A guide for the perplexed
http://environment.newscientist.com/channel/earth/dn11462?DCMP=NLC-nlett...
With so much at stake, it is right that climate science is subjected to the most intense scrutiny. What does not help is for the real issues to be muddied by discredited arguments or wild theories.
So for those who are not sure what to believe, here is our round-up of the most common climate myths and misconceptions.
There is also a guide to assessing the evidence. In the articles we've included lots of links to primary research and major reports for those who want to follow through to the original sources.
Can we trust the science?
• Chaotic systems are not predictable
http://environment.newscientist.com/channel/earth/climate-change/dn11641
• We can't trust computer models of climate
http://environment.newscientist.com/channel/earth/climate-change/dn11649
• Many leading scientists question climate change
http://environment.newscientist.com/channel/earth/climate-change/dn11654
• It's all a conspiracy
http://environment.newscientist.com/channel/earth/climate-change/dn11653
• They predicted global cooling in the 1970s
http://environment.newscientist.com/channel/earth/climate-change/dn11643
Is the sun to blame?
• Global warming is down to the Sun, not humans
http://environment.newscientist.com/channel/earth/climate-change/dn11650
• It’s all down to cosmic rays
http://environment.newscientist.com/channel/earth/climate-change/dn11651
Does CO2 cause warming?
• Human CO2 emissions are too tiny to matter
http://environment.newscientist.com/channel/earth/climate-change/dn11638
• CO2 isn't the most important greenhouse gas
http://environment.newscientist.com/channel/earth/climate-change/dn11652
• Ice cores show CO2 increases lag behind temperature rises, disproving the link
to global warming
http://environment.newscientist.com/channel/earth/climate-change/dn11659
• Ice cores show CO2 rising as temperatures fell
http://environment.newscientist.com/channel/earth/climate-change/dn11640
• The cooling after 1940 shows CO2 does not cause warming
http://environment.newscientist.com/channel/earth/climate-change/dn11639
What happened in the past?
• The 'hockey stick' graph has been proven wrong
http://environment.newscientist.com/channel/earth/climate-change/dn11646
• It's been far warmer in the past, what's the big deal?
http://environment.newscientist.com/channel/earth/climate-change/dn11647
• It was warmer during the Medieval period, with vineyards in England
http://environment.newscientist.com/channel/earth/climate-change/dn11644
• We are simply recovering from the Little Ice Age
http://environment.newscientist.com/channel/earth/climate-change/dn11645
What is happening now?
• Mars and Pluto are warming too
http://environment.newscientist.com/channel/earth/climate-change/dn11642
• Antarctica is getting cooler, not warmer, disproving global warming
http://environment.newscientist.com/channel/earth/climate-change/dn11648
• Polar bear numbers are increasing
http://environment.newscientist.com/channel/earth/climate-change/dn11656
• The lower atmosphere is cooling, not warming
http://environment.newscientist.com/channel/earth/climate-change/dn11660
• The oceans are cooling
http://environment.newscientist.com/channel/earth/climate-change/dn11664
What is going to happen?
• Warming will cause an ice age in Europe
http://environment.newscientist.com/channel/earth/climate-change/dn11838
• Higher CO2 levels will boost plant growth and food production
http://environment.newscientist.com/channel/earth/climate-change/dn11655
• Hurricane Katrina was caused by global warming
http://environment.newscientist.com/channel/earth/climate-change/dn11661
Why should I worry?
• It's too cold where I live - warming will be great
http://environment.newscientist.com/channel/earth/climate-change/dn11657
• We can't do anything about climate change
http://environment.newscientist.com/channel/earth/climate-change/dn11658
Post new comment